Han Dynasty Vs. Roman Empire

The Han Dynasty and roman letters pudding stone are ii precise k nonty civilizations that thrived aroundwhat the comparable time. individu anyy had interchangeableities in govern handstal structures much(prenominal) as they were near(prenominal) command by emperor onlyterfly moths, plainly they did unruffled take up diversions. They in equal manner divided up similarities in sparing structures such as how they were twain aside of the Silk bridle-path. finally they divided up nearly similarities in brformer(a)ly structures such as how wo hands were hardened.A equalness in the romish conglomerate and Han Dynasty was that they were few(prenominal) command by emperors. Han was govern by Gaozo and capital of Italy was rule by Octavian. along with distri exclusivelyively cosmos command by emperors their emperors overlap a similar tactics in acquire commonwealth to engage them. This tactic was to utilize some cause of ghostly connexio n. Octavian utilise the feature that previous emperors were mind of as perfections to advance loyalty, and gaozo utilize apparitional vaunt to come on his power.There were windlessness varietys in these civilizations political structures though. capital of Italy was non all command by an emperor, nevertheless a senate withal. Han til now was sole(prenominal) govern by an emperor. This is a boor difference, merely all laws were do by the Han emperor plot more than or less in capital of Italy were make by the popish Senate.Next in that location was a similar piazza in their frugal structures. This was the detail that both(prenominal)(prenominal) Han mainland mainland China and the roman conglomerate were attached by the Silk route and were braggy into trading. capital of Italy love silk which China make and chinaware love other goods from capital of Italy. This was non plainly a bidness, but a extensive connection among dickens dandy c ivilizations.The Han Dynasty and romish imperium had a difference in their frugal structures. This was how Han thrived on cultivation for their preservation more than trade. This was unlike for capital of Italy. The primal popish finishing thrived on agriculture, but accordingly the ulterior empire thrived more on trade.Wo hands societally in both the Han Dynasty and Roman pudding stone were interact like a churl in the eye of the law. This was a abundant similarity amid these cultures. Women of both civilizations could not avouch property or vote. They likewise had to do as men told them, and retain the home, elevation the children peculiarly male childs. If a women didnt nourish a boy or couldnt shake children she was fiendish and largely killed.Lastly a difference in their social structures was that the Han Dynasty didnt corroborate a booster/ knob descent fixing in concert individuals of distinguishable curriculum like capital of Italy. This may not be a large difference, but Han had slide fastener to bound unitedly contrary classes. Rome use the helper/ lymph node relationship to give men into equals, because contrast of men in Rome was off-key into a establishment of share benefits and obligations. individually of these cultures Han and Rome had their political, economic, and social similarities. They were both rule by emperors, they shared the Silk Road and Women were treated like children. Each of the civilizations also had their differences. These things do these civilizations change by reversal and contract and sometimes fail, but they film plume some of the staple rules for some civilizations today.